That role is one where the player who took his roster spot would need to step up. Ripkowski has been a significant contributor on special teams since his rookie season in 2015. There is one problem that I don’t have an immediate solution for should the Packers not carry a fullback into 2018. There are a number of talented players vying for playing time and competing for roster spots at those positions and even a couple of others. ![]() To not carry any fullbacks onto the roster would open up roster spots for either an additional EDGE defender, running back, wide receiver, or even another tight end. This could allow Green Bay to get even more weapons on the field and create even more mismatches for Aaron Rodgers to exploit. Both are better pass catchers and better athletes than Ripkowski ever will be. The additional benefit of using either Lewis or Kendricks in the role of a fullback is the dynamic ability that they could both bring to the position. Kendricks is not the same caliber of blocker as Lewis, but certainly is sufficient enough to warrant some snaps in a blocking role. Kendricks’ role in this offense already is as an H-Back, commonly consisting of being used as a blocker for the running game. However, in a pinch, Lewis could easily fulfill the duties that would be requested of a fullback.Īnother option would be veteran tight-end Lance Kendricks. I am not calling fullback and tight-end the same position. Marcedes Lewis is arguably the best run blocking tight end in the NFL. They already have a premier run blocker on the roster. Now, just because the team doesn’t bring a fullback onto the roster, that doesn’t mean they have to abandon a power running game that uses a fullback. However, with Green Bay being three deep at the running back position and the development of Jamaal Williams as a pass protector, Rip’s role has become even more diminished. In Ripkowksi’s defense, he has provided value as a pass protector and an emergency de-facto running back in the past. But, this also speaks to the turning of the tide in the NFL regarding the shift from power running to primarily passing the ball.Ģ018 could finally be the year where a fullback is not carried onto the 53-man roster. For a coach who supposedly values the fullback so highly, I would both expect and like to see that utilization be a little higher. According to, the Packers ran more than one running back onto the field about 15 percent of the time. For intents and purposes of personnel grouping, fullbacks are considered running backs. The Packers were in the middle of the pack when it came to the utilization of two or more running backs. But, how often do the Packers even use a fullback? Power plays, by their simplest definition, are runs that involve a lead blocker of some sort and a runner who follows behind them. Now, as you can probably imagine, this type of player is best suited for an offense that commonly runs power plays. Occasionally, and if I may add, enthusiastically, a fullback will get the opportunity to run the ball or even catch a pass out of the backfield usually in some attempt at misdirection or simply keeping the defense unbalanced. To begin discussing this, let’s first establish what exactly that value is.įullbacks are primarily used as lead blockers for the primary runner. ![]() However, it was done and just speaks to McCarthy’s fondness of the value that a fullback provides to a team. And even in our case, for McCarthy to keep two, was rare. While keeping a fullback on the roster is not rare, it is not the norm. There are even seasons where the team has kept multiple. They, McCarthy and Co., have elected to keep fullbacks on the roster year after year. In an ever-changing NFL, the Packers have been swimming against the current. In lieu of Kuhn, the former Sooner has been aptly dubbed “Rip.” However, fan’s days of bellowing “Ripppp” from the grandstands may soon be coming to a close. Ripkowski’s tenure in Green Bay has been no different. On any given Sunday, you could catch Packers fans shamelessly crooning “Kuuuhn” to the masses at the slightest opportunity. Just as McCarthy has, fans have gained an affinity for the fullback position. The Packers drafted Aaron Ripkowski to be the heir apparent to former Packer and fan favorite, John Kuhn. Yet, Green Bay Packers head coach Mike McCarthy has displayed an affinity for the archaic position. Power running, specifically with a fullback, is becoming, if not already, rather antiquated. ![]() © 2023 The Buffalo Bills.I love smash-mouth football as much as Jon Gruden does.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |